Prop Firms · comparison
Blueberry Funded vs FXIFY: Which Prop Firm Fits Your Trading Style?
Firm rules and pricing checked through . Always verify current terms before purchase.
Blueberry Funded and FXIFY both offer instant funding alongside traditional evaluations, but they package risk and pricing very differently. Blueberry Funded keeps a simple, consistent menu with tight instant-funding drawdown limits, while FXIFY spreads 54 offerings across five model names and four evaluation structures for traders who want more granular control over target and drawdown combinations.
Quick Verdict: Blueberry Funded vs FXIFY at a Glance
Blueberry Funded, operating since 2024[3] and based in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines[3], trades through Blueberry Markets[3] and lists 31 account offerings across Lite, Elite, 1-step, and 2-step models. FXIFY, operating since 2022[4] and based in the United Kingdom[4], trades through FXPIG[4] and lists 54 offerings spanning Lite, Standard, Classic, Pro, and Lightning tiers across instant, 1-step, 2-step, and 3-step paths.
Both firms cap the standard split at 80[3]%, and both list a discount code worth checking at checkout: Blueberry's PFT[4]30[3][3] for 30[3]% off, and FXIFY's PFT[4] for 33%[4] off. A listed code isn't proof it's live the day you sign up, so verify before you pay.
Company Background
The two firms are domiciled differently and carry different operating histories. Blueberry Funded is based in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines[3] and has been operating since 2024[3]. FXIFY is based in the United Kingdom[4] and has been operating since 2022[4].
Each firm runs on a single named broker relationship: Blueberry Funded uses Blueberry Markets[3], and FXIFY uses FXPIG[4]. Account currency is USD[3] at both firms, which keeps pricing and payout comparisons straightforward without a currency-conversion layer to account for.
Evaluation Paths and Pricing
Blueberry Funded's 31 offerings run through instant funding (Lite and Elite tiers), 1-step evaluations, and 2-step evaluations. Profit targets stay consistent regardless of account size: a flat 10[3]%[3] on 1-step accounts, and P1 10[3]%[3] / P2 5%[3] on 2-step Elite accounts. Blueberry describes its evaluation process as a way to assess trader competence, filter for sound risk management, and build a disciplined trading community under a broker-backed structure.
FXIFY spreads its 54 offerings across five model names (Lite, Standard, Classic, Pro, Lightning) and four structures (instant funding, 1-step, 2-step, and 3-step evaluations), giving traders more granularity in how target and drawdown combinations are packaged.
At the $10[3],000 size, Blueberry's 2-step Elite account is $90[3] and its 1-step account is $75[3], versus FXIFY's Lightning 1-step at $59[4] and Standard 2-step at $89[4]. At the $10[3]0[3],000 size, Blueberry lists its 1-step account at $550[3] and its 2-step accounts at $620[3] to $650[3], while FXIFY lists its 1-step account at $549[4], its 2-step accounts (Standard and Classic) at $549[4], and its 3-step account at $39[4]9[4]. The gap between the two firms narrows or reverses depending on account size and step count, so pricing alone shouldn't be the deciding factor; check the rules attached to each specific offering first.
Drawdown and Risk Rules Compared
Blueberry's Lite instant-funding tier runs a tight 2%[3] daily loss and 4%[3] max loss across every account size in the lineup, from the $1,250 offering up through $10[3]0[3],000. That's the tightest instant-funding drawdown structure in this comparison. Blueberry's Elite and evaluation offerings step up from there, using 4%[3] to 5%[3] daily loss and 6%[3] to 10[3]%[3] max loss depending on the specific model chosen.
FXIFY's Standard instant-funding accounts run a looser 8%[4] daily loss and 8%[4] max loss. Its evaluation-track accounts (Lightning, Standard, Classic, Pro, and 3-step) generally sit in a 3%[4] to 4%[3] daily loss range, with max loss between 4%[3] and 10[3]%[3] depending on the account type. FXIFY's own drawdown documentation notes that most evaluation programs carry daily drawdown limits between 4%[3] and 5%[3], with maximum loss limits between 6%[3] and 10[3]%[3] depending on whether the account uses a static or trailing model.
The trailing drawdown mechanic is a meaningful difference. FXIFY uses both static and trailing drawdown models depending on account type, and withdrawals can affect trailing drawdown calculations. In a documented example, a $10[3]0[3],000 account with a 5%[3] daily drawdown and 6%[3] max trailing drawdown that grows to $10[3]6,000[2] and withdraws $6,000[2] can see the drawdown threshold reset close to breach levels; the withdrawal may still be processed, but the account can become automatically breached after the balance adjustment. Blueberry's listed rules don't include this trailing-withdrawal interaction, which makes its drawdown behavior more predictable for traders who plan to withdraw mid-cycle.
Blueberry also runs a hyperactivity rule, monitoring for excessive lot sizing, unrealistic trading frequency, and gambling-style execution, with accounts subject to manual review if activity looks unsustainable. On the flip side, Blueberry has removed traditional consistency rules across nearly all its active challenge models (1-step, 2-step, and instant), meaning no payout restriction based on a "best trading day" and no fixed daily profit percentage cap on active challenge programs.
Profit Targets and Profit Split
Blueberry's target menu is simple: a flat 10[3]%[3] on 1-step accounts and P1 10[3]%[3] / P2 5%[3] on every 2-step Elite account, regardless of size. That consistency makes it easy to plan an evaluation without cross-checking target percentages against account size.
FXIFY's targets vary meaningfully by model. Lightning accounts use a 5%[3] target, Standard and Classic 2-step accounts use 10[3]%[3]/5%[3] or 5%[3]/10[3]%[3] depending on which phase is P1 versus P2, 3-step accounts use 5%[3]/5%[3]/5%[3] across all three phases, and Pro accounts use 4%[3]/8%[4]. This gives traders more structures to choose from, but it also means the target isn't obvious from the account name alone; it needs to be checked per offering.
Both firms default to an 80[3]% profit split for the trader, and both advertise a path to up to 90[3]%[1] through optional scaling or add-ons at checkout. The standard split matches exactly, so the practical difference comes down to how each firm structures the upgrade path to that higher split, not the ceiling itself.
Payout Speed, Methods, and Split Mechanics
Blueberry Funded pays every 14 days as the standard cadence across all 31 listed offerings, with optional 7-day or on-demand payout add-ons available for traders who want faster access. Payouts arrive via crypto or Riseworks.
FXIFY's evaluation-track funded accounts (1-phase, 2-phase, and 3-phase) get a first payout on demand once the trader qualifies, with subsequent payouts available every 14 days depending on the selected payout configuration. Instant funding accounts at FXIFY are also paid every 14 days, though some programs require a minimum withdrawal threshold. FXIFY pays via bank transfer, Riseworks, or crypto, which gives traders a traditional bank-transfer option that Blueberry's listed payout methods (crypto and Riseworks only) don't include.
Platforms, Instruments, and Funding Methods
Both firms share MT4, MT5, and DXtrade as trading platforms. Blueberry adds TradeLocker to its lineup, while FXIFY adds TradingView, so the platform choice may come down to whether you prefer TradeLocker's execution style or TradingView's charting tools.
On asset classes, Blueberry covers crypto, metals, fx, indices, and other commodities. FXIFY covers that same core set and adds stocks, which is unique to FXIFY in this comparison. Both list CFD as the instrument type across their offerings. FXIFY notes that crypto trading is available on supported MT4 and MT5 accounts, though certain instant funding accounts may restrict weekend crypto holding, a detail worth checking if you plan to hold crypto positions over the weekend.
Deposit methods diverge sharply. Blueberry supports a wide range of regional rails, including NGN bank transfer, UPI, GCash, PIX, IMPS, GrabPay, crypto, and card, which makes it more accessible for traders funding accounts from emerging markets. FXIFY funds via crypto, card, or PayPal, a narrower but still globally usable set.
Which Trader Should Choose Which Firm
Traders who want the tightest, most predictable instant-funding drawdown, paired with access to regional payment rails like UPI, PIX, or GCash, may lean toward Blueberry Funded's Lite accounts. The 2%[3] daily loss / 4%[3] max loss structure holds steady across every account size, and the absence of traditional consistency rules on active challenges gives more flexibility in how profits are distributed day to day.
Traders who want more evaluation-path choice (1-step, 2-step, or 3-step), TradingView charting, and stock CFD exposure alongside fx, metals, indices, and crypto may lean toward FXIFY. The tradeoff is more rule variation to track, including the trailing drawdown mechanic that can interact with withdrawals on certain account types.
Whichever path you're weighing, the differing profit targets and drawdown structures at these two firms make preparation worthwhile before committing an evaluation fee. Chart Academy offers free video masterclasses on risk management and trading psychology, which is useful groundwork whether you're aiming for Blueberry's flat 10[3]%[3] targets or navigating FXIFY's model-specific target structure.
Either way, confirm the listed coupon is still active at checkout: PFT[4]30[3][3] for 30[3]% off at Blueberry Funded, PFT[4] for 33%[4] off at FXIFY. A listed code is not proof it's currently valid.
Frequently asked questions
What are the account sizes and prices at Blueberry Funded and FXIFY?
Blueberry Funded lists 31 offerings from $1,250 up to $200[3],000, with 2-step Elite pricing such as $90[3] at $10[3],000 and $650[3] at $10[3]0[3],000. FXIFY lists 54 offerings from $1,000 up to $400[4],000, with pricing such as $89[4] for a Standard 2-step at $10[3],000 and $549[4] for a Standard 2-step at $10[3]0[3],000.
Does Blueberry Funded or FXIFY offer a 3-step evaluation?
FXIFY offers 3-step evaluation accounts, for example a $5,000 offering priced at $39[4] with a 5%[3]/5%[3]/5%[3] profit target across three phases. Blueberry Funded's listed offerings run through instant funding, 1-step, and 2-step paths only.
What is the profit split at each firm?
Both firms default to an 80[3]% profit split for the trader. Both also advertise a path to up to 90[3]%[1] through optional scaling or add-ons selected at checkout.
How does trailing drawdown work at FXIFY?
FXIFY uses both static and trailing drawdown models depending on account type. On trailing accounts, withdrawals can affect the drawdown calculation; in a documented $10[3]0[3],000 example with 6%[3] max trailing drawdown, growing the account to $10[3]6,000[2] and withdrawing $6,000[2] can reset the drawdown threshold close to breach levels, and the account can become automatically breached after the balance adjustment.
How often do Blueberry Funded and FXIFY pay out?
Blueberry Funded pays every 14 days as standard across all listed offerings, with optional 7-day or on-demand add-ons. FXIFY gives evaluation-track funded accounts a first payout on demand after qualification, then every 14 days depending on configuration, while instant funding accounts are paid every 14 days, with some requiring a minimum withdrawal threshold.
What discount codes are available at each firm?
Blueberry Funded lists coupon PFT[4]30[3][3] for 30[3]% off, and FXIFY lists coupon PFT[4] for 33%[4] off. These are database-listed offers, so confirm both are still active at checkout since a listed code is not guaranteed to be currently valid.
Data as of 2026-08-28.
Risk disclaimer: Trading carries a substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for everyone. Prop-firm evaluations charge fees and most traders do not pass. Nothing here is financial advice; figures can change, so verify current terms with the firm before purchasing.
Affiliate disclosure: propfirmtrader may earn a commission if you sign up through links on this page, at no extra cost to you. This never affects our assessments.
Evidence
Sources and verification
These sources support the material rules, figures and exceptions in this revision. Commercial destinations are not treated as evidence.
- [1][Instant Funding Lite] What are the add-ons available for Instant Funding Lite?FXIFY · checked 28 Aug 2026
- [2]How do you calculate the Max Trailing Drawdown? (1 & 2 [Standard] Phase)FXIFY · checked 28 Aug 2026
- [3]PropFirmTrader structured datasetPropFirmTrader · checked 28 Aug 2026
- [4]PropFirmTrader structured datasetPropFirmTrader · checked 28 Aug 2026
Read how we collect, verify and correct information in our research methodology.
Next step
Turn the research into a shortlist.
Compare current account sizes, platforms, discounts and funding terms side by side.
Compare prop firms